beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.01.10 2015가단11711

유류분반환

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The network E (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) married with Defendant C and had children as Defendant D, the Plaintiffs, F, G, and H, who are children.

The Deceased died on October 25, 2006, and as indicated in the following table, each of the real estate owned by the Deceased (hereinafter referred to as “each of the real estate in this case”) was donated to the Defendants and Defendant D’s wife or bequeathed to the Defendants and Defendant D’s wife.

On November 2, 1998, the beneficiary of the date of registration Nos. 1, 1, 2212 square meters, J. 2, 198, the beneficiary of the real estate registration date, was newly built on November 2, 1998, the Defendant D2, the above K 1927 square meters on November 4, 1998, which was donated on November 2, 1998, the Defendant D3, the above L No. 906 square meters on November 4, 1998, and the Defendant D 4, the above M 33593 square meters on November 2, 1998, the 6.1, 201, the 6.1, 206. 7. 6. 7. 1, 206. 1, 206, 206, 36. 7. 5, 25, 201, 6. 6. 1, 206

On November 6, 2006, 2006, except for the real estate of this case donated by Defendant C on October 31, 2006, the Deceased did not have any particular property at the time of death.

[Grounds for recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 2-1 through 9, the fact inquiry results about the Court Administration Office of this Court, Daegu Bank, National Bank of Korea, Nonghyup Bank, Nonghyup Bank, Cheonggu New Cooperative, and Squa Saemaul Depository, each order to submit financial transaction information about the court administration of this Court, and the plaintiffs exercise their right to claim the return of legal reserve of this case as to each of the real estate of this case. The defendants asserted that the plaintiff's right to claim the return of legal reserve of this case has expired after the expiration of the period of extinctive prescription as stipulated in the first sentence of Article

Article 1117 of the Civil Act is stipulated.

참조조문