If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On February 12, 2019, from around 20:0 to 20:30, the Defendant, at the frequency of the victim C’s operation located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu to enter the restaurant and return to the restaurant while under the influence of alcohol, and to the other customers, “this spacte will throw away from this spacte.e., gu,” and the Defendant, upon receiving a request for eviction from the victim, continued to take a bath and interfered with the restaurant business of the victim by force by leaving around 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen of a CCTV image closure;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by taking into account the following factors: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is a contingent crime; (b) the agreement with the victim; (c) the degree of interference with the defendant’s business; and (d) the conditions of sentencing prescribed in