When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On September 15, 2016, the Defendant damaged the property by opening a taxi door during the process of dispute with the friendly-gu and walking the door behind the friendly-gu, while under the influence of alcohol, on the front side of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Seoul Mapo-gu”) around 05:30 on September 15, 2016, the Defendant was unable to know the amount of damage, and then damaged the property so that the amount of damage may not be known due to the defect at least 20 meters of the son’s repair cost.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the disturbance of revocation in the official note) on September 15, 2016, and under the influence of alcohol from the Hongk District District located in Mapo-ro, Seoul, 11:63 on September 15, 2016 to the police officers working for the same reason as Paragraph 1, while under the influence of alcohol not being arbitrarily accompanied for the reason as set forth in paragraph 1.

The treatment, which is a crime, shall be discarded to four kinds of fluora.

A person who conducts very rough words and conducts in a riotous manner, such as "a strush shots", and performed a disturbing act for about 40 minutes.

As a result, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, conveyed by very rough words and conducts in the Red Dok District, which is a government office, by a very rough words and conducts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Voluntary accompanying reporting, a duplicate or photograph of damage, a written statement of the main offender, and the revocation of the main shareholder of a government office means the application of video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of revocation of the principal) and the selection of fines for the crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;