2. The facts that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime and reflects the mistake are considered favorable to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed on June 11, 2013 by the Defendant, who caused 8 weeks of injury to bicycle riders by shocking the bicycle while driving under influence on the same day. However, even though the Defendant was placed in the place of probation, it is deemed that the Defendant driven a car under the status of 0.141% of blood alcohol level again during the period of probation, and the crime was not good, and all of the sentencing conditions in the argument of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.