When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 13, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor in the Daegu District Court Port Branch, and on December 22, 2016, the Daegu High Court sentenced the Defendant to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) and confirmed on the 30th of the same month.

1. On November 10, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) stated “E” in the applicant’s name column, “F” in the resident registration number column, and “E” in the customer registration column; (b) signed on the next side in the purchase customer information column in the “F” and “E” column; (c) written in the “E” and the applicant’s name in the “E” column; (d) written in the “E” and written in the “E” column; and (e) signed in the “E” column; and (e) written in the applicant column in the “E” column without authority for the purpose of exercising the signature of “E” in the “E” column; and (e) forged an application for the purchase of the said E’s private document related to rights and duties without authority for the purpose of exercising the signature of “E” thereafter.

2. The Defendant: (a) submitted to the said “D” seller G a forged service contract; (b) a short-term installment transaction contract; and (c) a written application for subscription to the fare discount scheme to the said seller G, who was aware of the forgery at the said time and place; and (d) exercised the said document as if the document was duly formed.

3. The defrauded made a false statement to the effect that “If the Defendant opens a mobile phone, he/she would pay the mobile phone price and the user fee if he/she opened the mobile phone because he/she obtained the victim SK Telecom Agency’s opening permission.” at the above date and place.

However, in fact, the defendant purchased the opened mobile phone without the consent of E in the nominal owner and removed the core chip, and then disposed of it to the seller of the used mobile phone, and even if he received the above mobile phone from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.