beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.09.23 2015고단1317

산업안전보건법위반등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B’s fine of KRW 5,00,000, and Defendant C Company’s fine of KRW 10,000,00, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director and the person in charge of safety and health management of the company E located in Ulsan-gun E, Ulsan-gu, and the defendant B is the head of the environmental safety team of the C, and the defendant C is a corporation established for the purpose of the business of manufacturing and selling sted, and the victim F (38 years of age) is the person working for the facility management team.

1. At around 08:40 on February 6, 2015, Defendant B, at the above C Co., Ltd., the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as allowing the victim to wear a heating uniform prior to the operation of a stable, conducting thorough safety education, etc., inasmuch as the inside of the said axis was at the height of approximately 457-850 degrees east, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as allowing the victim to wear a heating uniform prior to the operation of a stable, and conducting thorough safety education.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not require the victim to wear a heating uniform and did not conduct safety education, and had the victim enter the said axis with no safety gear to conduct an inspection work, and caused the victim's death in a video on the site where a high temperature, which was attached to the wall with a bed with a bed with a bed with a bed with a bed with a bed.

2. Defendant A, at the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) above, had the victim conduct an inspection with a stable, and in such a case, the Defendant, a person in charge of safety and health management, has a duty of care to ensure that the Defendant, as a person in charge of safety and health management, should take necessary measures to prevent risks, such as the installation of a flood-free net, a vertical protection net, and a protective shelter, the establishment of an access prohibition zone, and the wearing of protective outfits, etc., to workers engaged in dangerous work, such as images by high heat, have a duty of care to require him to wear a

Nevertheless, the defendant does not require the victim to wear a heating uniform or take such measures.