However, it is against the Defendants for 3 years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On July 2012, Defendant B offered that Defendant A would know about the operation of a game room for face-to-face use of money. In addition, the Defendants would operate the game room, and the Defendants would operate the game room together. Defendant A was in charge of all the capital necessary for the operation of the game room, Defendant B was in charge of so-called “the doorbook” in the game room’s care and at the entrance of the game room, and Defendant B was in charge of so-called “the doorbook” in the game room’s care and exchange, etc., and e was in charge of the management and exchange of customers in the game room, and the Defendants conspired to install a “sea-to-face” game machine, which is a game product not rated by the Game Rating Committee, in collusion with Defendants E and intended to engage in speculative activities.

From August 2012 to September 2012, the Defendants: (a) no one may provide a game that was not rated by the Game Rating Board for the use of the game; (b) from August 2012 to September 2012, the Cheongju-gu F2 Game Center, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si; (c) shared the duties as above; and (d) installed 30 games of the “sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-sea” game, a speculative machine that did not receive an example and an example, and provided customers with 10,000 won to initiate the game; and (d) provided customers with cash according to the points that they acquired in the game process.

As a result, the Defendants provided game products without rating in collusion with E for use, and engaged in speculative activities by using speculative gaming machines.

B. The Defendants committed the crime from Sep. 2, 2012 to Oct. 10, 2012 are prohibited from providing game products that have not been rated by the Game Rating Board for use. However, the Defendants are the second floor of the Cheongju-gu G2nd floor from Sep. 2012 to Oct. 2012.