A Imprisonment of eight months, Defendant B’s imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and Defendant C’s fine of five thousand won, respectively.

Defendant .

Defendant A, on February 4, 2008, was sentenced to imprisonment for the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act by the Seoul Northern District Court on February 4, 2008, and the same criminal records are more than 15 times, and Defendant B, on May 26, 2011, was sentenced to imprisonment for the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Jung-gu District Court Goyang branch on May 26, 201, and the same criminal records are more than 14 times.

Criminal facts

Defendants are punished by death penalty.

At around 00:10 on October 6, 2013, the Defendants: (a) from the “G Kinginginging machine” operated by the Victim F (F (FF) on the first floor underground of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; (b) Going the face of the victim, Defendant A would take the face of the victim by drinking it; and (c) the victim was able to take the face of the victim by combining the Defendant B with the defect of 112 report.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as the closed mind and pelleta in need of approximately four weeks of treatment.

Defendant B, on November 25, 2013, was charged with non-detained as a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) in order to support the Jung-gu District Court on November 25, 2013 and is currently pending trial.

Criminal facts

1. The defendants are in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint destruction and damage, etc.), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint violence) and violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint violence).

On December 25, 2013, from around 13:00 to 13:30, the Defendants: (a) informed the victim I (the age of 40) of the first floor H of the Goyang-si H of Goyang-si H of Goyang-si, Ilyang-si; (b) caused the victim I to have broken the Defendant C, who was divingd in the Daba in the state of being drunk while under the influence of alcohol; (c) Defendant C was able to avoid disturbance by taking the victim I, who was set up within the Dabaro, once in the middle of the market price of the victim I owned by the victim I in the Daba-si; and (d) Defendant C was able to avoid disturbance by taking the victim I at the large interest of “Yeong-si, Irop, Irop.”