However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 2, 2015, around 01:15, the Defendant: (a) driven by the victim D (year 44) in front of the Hanam-si B, or on the road in front of the Hanam-si; (b) was resisted from the victim who was driven by the said vehicle in his hand while the window for the said vehicle was set off by his hand; (c) the victim was set at one time from the victim who was driven by the said vehicle; and (d) the victim was set at one time as a drinking house and a drinking house.

As a result, the defendant got off the left side of the victim who needs to receive approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. On September 2, 2015, at around 01:20 on September 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was asked from police officers G belonging to the Hanam Police StationF District, which was called out after receiving a report of 112 while causing injury to D; (b) was cut off the part of the above G and the part of the instant G bucks and the part of the right bucks that were cut off on one occasion; and (c) was cut down on the face of the above G.

Accordingly, the above G et al. arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and the Defendant, who was carrying the patrol vehicle on the H patrol vehicle, and the Defendant, by walking the door of the said patrol vehicle several times, destroyed the above vehicle to have approximately KRW 506,658 in sum of the repair cost.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers, and damaged things used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1), Article 136 (1) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for probation and community service order is that the defendant is divided into his crime, agree with the victim, and agree with the victim police officer.