However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 모욕 피고인은 2014. 3. 3. 20:00경 구미시 B에 있는 C가 운영하는 ‘D’ 주점에서 술을 마시고 술값을 계산하지 않는 등 소란을 피우다가 위 C의 112신고를 받고 출동한 구미경찰서 E지구대 소속 경위인 피해자 F, 피해자 G에게 위 C 및 손님 등이 듣고 있는 가운데 “야 이 씨발놈들아, 개새끼들아, 좆같은 놈들아, 짭새가 할 짓이 없어서 오냐, 개새끼들아”라고 큰소리로 욕설을 하는 등 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다.

2. When and at the same time and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant used the victim’s chest as a blue blue and blue blue at the time and place, and when F of the circumstances belonging to the Gu American Police Station E District said “blue blue”, the Defendant used the victim’s chest as a blue that occurred

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to G, F, and C

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act are damaged by several persons, the fact that there is no previous conviction, the fact that there is no previous conviction, and the reflective circumstances are considered, respectively, in consideration of the extenuating circumstances, and the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1 year and April), the lower limit of the basic area (6-1 year and April), and all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, shall be determined as ordered.