A. As to each real estate listed in [Attachment 1] List Nos. 1 and 2 of Sep. 13, 1973 among each real estate listed in [Attachment 1] List Nos. 1 and 1 (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”), J completed the registration of ownership transfer in its future for each real estate listed in [Attachment 1] List Nos. 4 and 5 of [Attachment 1] on August 19, 1981.

B. The Plaintiff, the wife of Defendant B, both of the J, resided with the J and was a farmer in each of the instant real estate. After his death, after his death, the Plaintiff occupied and used each of the instant real estate until now, such as setting up a farmer’s house directly in each of the instant real estate, having K or L, and having a neighboring resident do so, and receiving rent. Local taxes on each of the instant real estate are also paid by the Plaintiff.

C. The J died on June 1, 1989, and the Defendants, their children, succeeded to the property of the J, such as the inheritance shares listed in the attached Table 2.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff and defendant B, D, E, and G: The plaintiff and defendant C, F, H, and I have no dispute: The non-contentious facts, Gap 1 through 7 evidence (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, at least the Plaintiff occupied each of the instant real estate in peace and public performance with the intent to own it for 20 years from June 1, 1989 as the date of possession of each of the instant real estate.

Since then on June 1, 2009, the acquisition by prescription of possession of each real estate of this case was completed.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the Defendants, the heir of the owner J on the registry of each real estate of this case, are obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on June 1, 2009 with respect to the inheritance shares listed in the separate list No. 2 of each real estate of this case to the Plaintiff, except in extenuating circumstances.

3. Determination as to Defendant C, F, H, and I’s assertion

A. As to the assertion that the Plaintiff is only an occupation assistant, 1.