2. Although the defendant's mistake is recognized, it is relatively old that 64 years old, the old-age pension and the income earned through arbrate are living, and living conditions are very difficult. In 1984, there is no record of punishment except punishment for a crime of the same kind as the crime in this case, and it is hard to say that he does not repeat again. However, the defendant did not receive a letter from the injured party due to medical expenses, etc. or agreement with the injured party. Considering the above circumstances of the defendant, the court below seems to have already sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million reduced to KRW 3 million under the summary order, and considering the motive and circumstances leading up to the crime in this case, the circumstances before and after the crime, the defendant's personality and behavior, the defendant's occupation, family relation, etc., the court below's decision cannot be deemed to have been unfair and too unfair, considering various circumstances such as the defendant's motive and circumstances leading to the crime in this case, the circumstances before and after the crime in this case, the defendant's occupation and family relation.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.