2. It is recognized that the decision-making defendant divided his mistake, and that some damaged goods have been returned.

However, the crime of this case is not good; the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime of the same kind even though he had been tried by several times, and did not properly recover or agree from the crime of this case until the court below; the sentencing balance with the criminal of this case is balanced with the punishment of the same crime; the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment; the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.