beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.09 2016가단5080614

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 49,182,056, respectively, to Plaintiff A and the Plaintiff B, and C, respectively; and (b) from December 19, 2014 to December 2016.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) D is a cargo vehicle E (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) around 18:27 December 19, 2014.

) A driver’s license and drive a three-lanes of the four-lanes of the four-lanes of the point located on the 130km away from the eastgwon to the Jinyoung stop located on the Jindong-si, Jindong-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Chungcheongnam-do. The F (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) proceeding from the two-lanes to the same embankment.

(B) the Gbelle or a car of a driving (hereinafter “Plaintiff”)

) On the ground that he changed the lane to a three-lanes for the Defendant 1, the vehicle for the Defendant 1, which was obvious in the day of the accident, was changed to a two-lane, and that the vehicle for the Defendant 1 was cut to a three-lane, and then was cut to a four-lane, and the Plaintiff 14 km in speed in front of the Plaintiff 1. In order to prevent the occurrence of the accident, the Deceased stopped the Plaintiff 1, and the H 2.5 metric freight of H driving, which followed the Plaintiff 1’s vehicle at a four-lane, was stopped rapidly. However, J, which followed the horse 2.5 tons of the vehicle, was driven to a four-lane, shall be referred to as the “Defendant 2”).

2) The Defendant 1 was at the front of the Defendant 2’s vehicle, and the Defendant 1 was at the front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant 1 was at the front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant 1 was at the front of the vehicle, and the Defendant 1 was at the front of the vehicle, and the Defendant 2 was at the front of the vehicle, due to the head injury, etc. (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The Plaintiff’s vehicle was at the front of the vehicle, and the Defendant 1 was at the front of the vehicle, and the Plaintiff was at the front of the vehicle, and the Plaintiff died at the scene due to the head injury, etc. (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

(2) The Plaintiff A is the deceased’s spouse, Plaintiff B, and C, and the Defendant is the mutual aid operator who entered into an automobile mutual aid agreement with respect to the Defendant 1 and 2.

[Reasons for Recognition]