업무상횡령
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
From February 2005, the Defendant has been working as the representative director of the company D who entered into a management contract for the business center building in Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, Seoul, and has been engaged in the business of collecting parking fees for the same commercial building.
On October 207, the Defendant embezzled the total amount of KRW 2,263,00,00, collected from vehicles parked in the same building for ten (10) months in his office in the above commercial building, for the victim company, and then used it voluntarily for personal purposes, such as the payment of his own insurance premium, etc. at the daily center in Gwangju City around that time, and from that time until April 2008, the Defendant embezzled the parking fee of KRW 11,062,50 in total by the same seven (7) methods as in the list of crimes in attached Form.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement of E and F;
1. Application of parking management regulations and statutes on the settlement of parking fees;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act (Overallly, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the decision of the type] Embezzlement 100,000 won [the decision of the recommended area] The basic area of embezzlement and breach of trust [the decision of the recommended area] / [the scope of the recommended punishment] / the defendant has embezzled parking fees collected over several times after entering into a service contract with the victim company and has not reached an agreement with the victim company until now, etc., it is deemed that strict punishment is necessary for the defendant. However, the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected against him/her; the defendant is the primary offender without any previous conviction; the defendant is the primary offender without any previous conviction; it is difficult to view that the amount of embezzlement is excessive amount; and the defendant is to pay the victim company the remaining amount by the end of November 2013.”