However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 18:00 on October 10, 2015, the Defendant received a report from the victim E (3) who was a police box belonging to the police station D police station, and called for the Defendant at around 112 during the dispute with the farmer who was living together on the farm road located on B of the racing. On October 18:0, 2015, the Defendant was removed from the victim E (47 years old) who was a police box belonging to the police station D police box, and caused the victim to string the snow part of E on the date of treatment.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to six photographs, three photographs, and diagnostic instruments; and

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the same Act shall be imposed in the same manner as the order, in consideration of the following: although the nature of the offense of the defendant is not somewhat weak due to the cases of inflicting bodily injury on the police officer in charge