However, since at the time, crosswalks are installed at night and at the front of the road, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to determine the safety of the course by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and found the victim E (year 41) who was fright at the crosswalkd at the taxi in order to see the urine, and received the victim as a part of the left part of the Defendant’s bus and sustained the injury of the victim under the real name of the right side due to the shock.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 268(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim prepared a written agreement stating that he/she shall not be punished against the defendant on January 15, 2014, after the institution of the instant indictment, and submitted it to this court. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag