However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 2, 2020, the Defendant committed a crime around 01:35, on November 2, 2020, at the front of the “C” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul-si, on November 2, 2020, “a male is taking time off a female,” the Defendant was asked by the head of the police station affiliated with the police station in the Suwon-si, the Suwon-si, the police station in the Suwon-si, the police station in the Suwon-si, the police station in the Suwon-si, and the police officer F of the Republic of Korea to ask questions about the situation of the dispute.

“The above E’s chest was carried out by hand, and was carried out once by hand on the part of the above E’s chest, and was carried out once as a drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On November 2, 2020, the Defendant assaulted the above E on November 2, 2020, and arrested a flagrant offender due to interference with the performance of official duties on November 2, 2020, and arrived in the front of the D District Unit of the Suwon-gu Police Station Down in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, as seen in paragraph (1) of the same Article. The Defendant, who was traveling to the earth by withing the Defendant as her father, was under the influence of alcohol, and the said F was under the influence of the Defendant, who was moving to the earth by her with her f’s humb, and carried the humf of the said F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the escort of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site conditions, etc.) on each police statement protocol with respect to E and F, by violence committed by each police force;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and the following circumstances, including the defendant’s age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as follows.

Interference with the execution of official duties at a disadvantage shall interfere with the functions of the State by obstructing legitimate exercise of public authority.