except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 20, 2014, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would deliver 30,000 won to D instead of a dry Sea-to-Yin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-kin-k

The Defendant deposited 30 million won check around July 22, 2014, when the Defendant kept the money wired from the victim for the victim, and deposited 30 million won check to G, who is the Defendant’s leakage, in the cashing around October 1, 2014, and used 15 million won among them for personal purposes by returning it to the said E account under the Defendant’s name, and then arbitrarily consumed the remainder for the Defendant’s use.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement concerning I and H;

1. Each police statement made to B, J, and I;

1. Details of remittance transactions;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes shall apply to investigation reports (including submission of details of remittance transfer and recording notes, accompanying documents), remittance details and recording records, investigation reports (including submission of details of account transaction, accompanying documents of suspect A E account transactions), investigation reports (including attachment of accompanying documents), investigation reports (the result of execution of a warrant of search and inspection), investigation reports (the result of execution of a warrant of search and inspection), investigation reports (the result of execution of a warrant of search and inspection) (the result of execution of a warrant of search and inspection), investigation reports (the endorser of a check, K of L, hearing by telephone), investigation reports (the submission of three check records of suspect A0 million won) (the execution of a warrant of search and inspection), investigation reports (the results of execution of a warrant of search and inspection), investigation reports (the comprehensive report of results of execution of a warrant of search and inspection), investigation reports (the report of results of execution of a

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] Type 1 (100 million won) is the basic area (4-1-1 year and April).