손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. A. Around August 2008, the Plaintiff entered into a delegation contract with the Defendant for the construction of a new start-up factory (hereinafter “instant construction”) on the land of 127,954 square meters (hereinafter “instant factory site”) outside the Gyeongnam-gun and 14 square meters (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).
B. On August 29, 2008, the Defendant purchased a factory site from D on August 29, 2008 in accordance with the instant delegation contract, and completed the construction of the factory site after purchasing the land in such a way as to conclude a sales contract with
C. On November 27, 2008, the Defendant applied for approval of the business plan for the establishment of a small and medium enterprise in the name of E representative Plaintiff, F representative G, H representative G, and H representative I, which is three enterprises occupying a factory, and the Minister of Development, Food and Rural Affairs approved the business plan for the establishment of a small and medium enterprise to the above three enterprises on February 27, 2009.
The Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Jinwon District Prosecutors' Office on the grounds of fraud, etc. on the grounds that the Defendant acquired money as security money, but was not subject to a disposition of non-prosecution on January 26, 201, by means of punishment No. 16516, the Jinwon District Prosecutors' Office, 2010, which was sentenced to a non-prosecution disposition. The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication on this matter, but the Plaintiff was also dismissed by Busan High Court Decision 201Hu155, Jun. 16, 201.
E. DS Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “DS Construction”) filed a complaint with the Defendant, J, and K under the pretext of granting the right to construct a factory and construct a factory. However, on September 14, 2010, the lower court rendered a non-prosecution disposition to the effect that there was no suspicion by failing to prove evidence due to the failure to perform its duties as the head of J. and K’s J., and the lower court was dismissed on January 3, 201 by Busan High Court Decision 2010 Seocho Jae-717, supra.
[Based on recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2, 3, and Eul evidence 2 include several numbers.