However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On September 3, 2015, at around 03:00 on September 3, 2015, Defendants E (n, 20 years old) and Si expenses are attached to the victim E (n, 20 years old) and Si expenses that were located in the venue of the Defendants, and Defendant B had the victim’s face, and Defendant B had the head of the victim’s head.

The Defendants moved along with the victim to the community credit cooperatives in the same Dong, and committed assault to the victim, such as the victim's face and body at several times, shaking head debt, etc.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put the number of days of treatment to the victim, one of whom is unknown, so as to have a spacific chronism.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a written complaint, a photograph of part of an injury, and a written diagnosis of an injury, and an investigation report (report on the confirmation of the current status of

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The Defendants, along with the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, assaulted the victim, thereby causing serious injury to the victim, such as the pacifism and pacifism, and did not properly recover from damage.

However, all of the crimes of this case are recognized by the Defendants, and their mistakes are divided, and the Defendants paid 2 million won to the victims each under the pretext of the compensation for damages, there is no specific criminal power, and adult adult age is the age of the side, and the punishment should be determined like the disposition, considering the various favorable circumstances in relation to the Defendants.