When the above fine is not paid, the defendant shall be the defendant for 15 days.

Around 17:50 on December 19, 2016, at the D cafeteria operated by the victim C (75 tax) in the East Sea, the Defendant changed the alcohol to the victim. However, “the victim took a large amount of alcohol, so he would be flick,” and flicking the door after the Defendant released out of the entrance, but the Defendant was gathering the windows of the entrance owned by the victim so as to have approximately KRW 180,000,000,000 of the cost of repair.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs destroying respective sites and windows;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Article 366 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a repeated crime for the reason of the sentencing of the provisional payment order, and the fact that the same records are continuously repeated, etc. is disadvantageous or late, the fact that there is an agreement with the victim, the fact that the victim has reached an agreement with the victim, the defendant's physical health and family environment, etc. shall be decided to take the last place of the fine in a lump sum, and the defendant's punishment is determined as the order.