도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On October 14, 2014, the Defendant is a person who violated the Road Traffic Act by driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on at least two occasions after being sentenced to a summary order of a fine of 1.5 million won by committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Jeju District Court on October 14, 2014, and a fine of 5 million won by committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Seoul Southern District Court on November 20, 2014.
On September 12, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license at around 22:42, driven a CP motor vehicle in the section of approximately 500 meters, from the 8th Do in the large-scale gal road of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to the 97 Gu-ro Do in front of the 8th Do in the large-scale gal road of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and from the road near the galk practice room.
"2015 Highest 441"
1. Around 06:00 on September 29, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 38 km from the front of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government German East Eastern Bank to the death of the Susi-si East-si.
2. On September 29, 2014, around 06:20 on September 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) while driving the above cargo vehicle in front of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and resulting in a traffic accident; (b) was demanded to appear at the police; (c) on October 6, 2014, the Defendant stated that he driven the said cargo vehicle to the pro-Japanese F, who was trying to conceal the unlicensed driving, and had the F make a false statement.
Therefore, around October 7, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that F is driving the said cargo by F in a traffic survey office at the Seoul Gwanak Police Station Office.
As a result, the defendant instigated F to escape a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. A report on the actual state of the driver;
1. Registers of driver's licenses;
1. Investigation report (F false statement);
1. A previous conviction in judgment: