beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.08.26 2020가단501325

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a legal entity entrusted with industrial accident compensation insurance affairs by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act; Defendant A is the driver of an individual taxi (hereinafter “instant individual taxi”); and Defendant B’s federation (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid company that entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant individual taxi.

around 19:50 on April 20, 2017, Defendant A driven the instant private taxi and proceeded along the front road of the private distance intersection in front of the New Changdong post office in the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the new line in the new line. Defendant A passed through the intersection by changing the two-lanes to the one-lanes of the two-lanes of the new line in the surface of the new line in the new line in the new line in the new line in the new line in the new zone in the new zone in the Dong-gu, Gwangju. Defendant A followed the behind the private taxi in this case while driving the private taxi in this case, and the private taxi in this case was changed to the two-lanes of the opposite line in the middle of the center where the central separation salary is installed, Defendant A sustained injuries by the victim in the side of the private taxi in this case, such as the front part of the motor vehicle in front of the front part of the driver E (hereinafter referred to as “victim”).

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid 56,172,620 won for medical care benefits, 39,127,600 won for temporary disability benefits, and 49,231,600 won for disability benefits.

[Grounds] The Plaintiff’s assertion of the following facts: Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 11 and Eul’s evidence Nos. 2 (including the main number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings occurred due to negligence by Defendant A committed an illegal internship; thus, the Defendants are liable for damages to the Plaintiff; and the Plaintiff paid insurance benefits to the victim, thereby claiming compensation against the Defendants by subrogation of the victim.