beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.02.10 2014가단8216

대여금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion is the employee of Daejeon Factory Co., Ltd., and the plaintiff was engaged in the business of industrial parts stay and installation, maintenance of factory facilities and US dollars with the trade name called D Engineering, and was engaged in the business of maintenance and management of C company's productionra under the defendant's order.

The Defendant borrowed KRW 65 million from May 16, 2005 to January 13, 2009 by means of borrowing the Plaintiff’s card or lending cash, etc. 3.670,000 won, total amount of KRW 9,5510,00,000 from the Plaintiff, by demanding transfer from May 16, 2005 to the Defendant’s name or a third party’s account with 1 million check.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to refund the above loan and damages for delay to the plaintiff.

2. As to whether the Defendant borrowed KRW 9,55.10,00 from the Plaintiff as alleged by the Plaintiff, the evidence Nos. 2 and 3 (each note) cannot be used as evidence because there is no evidence to prove the authenticity of the evidence, and the evidence Nos. 1 and 4 as to whether the Defendant borrowed KRW 9,55.10,00 from the Plaintiff as alleged by the Plaintiff is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant borrowed KRW 9,55.10,00 from the Plaintiff, solely on the basis of each order to submit financial transaction information to the Bank, the Nonghyup Bank, the Korean Bank, the No. 1 and 4, the National Bank, the Korea Post, the Korea Post, the Rosan Bank, the Rosan Bank, the Kasan Bank,

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.