2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on May 15, 2015 with a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter referred to as “Egypt”), and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on June 1, 2015.

B. On July 23, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having “a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer from persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On August 24, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on August 24, 2015, but the said objection was dismissed on December 14, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2 evidence, Eul 1 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that there are many slovas tiess flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus flus

The plaintiff was mistaken for the plaintiff to participate in the demonstration after the demonstration, and was under the influence of the Egypt government.

In the event that the Plaintiff returned to Egypt, the instant disposition that the Plaintiff did not recognize as a refugee despite the risk of persecution for the said reason is unlawful.

B. (1) In full view of the provisions of Article 2 Subparag. 1 and Article 18 of the Refugee Act, Article 1 of the Refugee Convention, and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol, race, religion, nationality, and nationality;