사기등
1. Defendant A’s imprisonment for one year, Defendant B’s imprisonment for one year, and Defendant C’s fine of 10,000,000 won, respectively.
2...
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is an auction hub, and Defendant B is a secretary of “C Judicial Scriveners Office”, and Defendant C is a certified judicial scrivener who operates “C Judicial scrivener Office”.
1. Defendant A and Defendant B
A. The Defendants, in violation of fraud and defense justice, conspired to receive money and valuables under the pretext of solicitation from the court officials against K who acquired the priority claim after the Gyeonggi JJ, which is the object of the auction in Suwon District Court’s ordinary real estate compulsory auction case.
Although Defendants are in Pyeongtaek-si L on March 23, 2016, and facts in the C judicial scrivener office do not allow to set the auction date as soon as possible, Defendant B may reduce the dividend amount to K as to the privately placed securities because of the increase in the interest of the senior claim if there is only one, and the amount of dividends to the privately placed securities.
It is necessary to KRW 2 million to advance the date of auction.
In the past, there are many court employees in the field of ordinary housing site, and I want to advance the date of auction through the people who want to do so.
Defendant A refers to a request for KRW 2 million at the cost of repair, and Defendant A is aware that there are many court employees by working for more than 10 years in the court.
B The head of the office refers to 200,000 won as activity expenses so that he/she can advance the auction date through the court personnel, and he/she received KRW 2 million from K to the bank account (Account Number M) with the name of C around 12:25 March 25, 2016.
As a result, the Defendants received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting or arranging affairs handled by public officials in collusion.
B. On July 4, 2016, the Defendants in violation of the Defense Justice agreed to receive money and valuables under the pretext of accepting a non-permission decision for sale by public officials of the court at the request of public officials of the competent district court, when they immediately arrive at the date of the sale of the Ganwon District Court’s Lanwon Special Housing Site auction case, and the first-class bidder was awarded a successful bid without participating in the bidding.