2. The judgment is a favorable condition to the defendant that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, and that the defendant has no record of committing the crime.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant in collusion with other accomplices to obtain a security loan as if he were the real estate of another person by exercising a forged resident registration certificate, and the nature of the crime is very poor. The method of crime is organized and intelligent, the amount of fraud is a large amount of 390 million won, and the remaining amount excluding approximately KRW 30 million out of the amount of fraud is not recovered. Even if the defendant did not lead the crime, he did not play an important role in the whole process of the crime, and taking into account other various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.