beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.04.12 2014누67736

요양비부지급처분취소

Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. On February 19, 2013, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval for medical care was revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the disposition, the plaintiff's assertion, and the relevant laws and regulations are as stated in the corresponding part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where "9." is referred to as "19." Thus, this part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Facts 1) On August 26, 1985, the Plaintiff joined FF as B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) and was engaged in work for approximately twenty-seven (two-seven (two-seven) years by connecting a large vessel to a block and connecting the block when building a large vessel).

B) The Plaintiff’s normal working hours are 08:0 to 17:00 each week, and are 0:0 each week, and are 0:0 to 10:0 each week, and are 10 to 20:0 each week, and 20:10 to 20:10 each week, and 20:0 each week, 20:10 to 30:10 each week, and 20:10 :0 each week, 200 to 20:10 :0 each week, 200 :10 :20 :10 :20 :10 :20 :20 : 30 :10 :20 :

The Plaintiff’s remaining hours of business is five times a week, one hour a day, and Saturdays work is two times a month from 08:00 to 17:00, and Sundays and holidays were closed. The non-party company is working for the Defendant while working.