beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2016.10.20 2016고단161

상해

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 12, 2016, at around 08:20, the Defendants were accommodated in the first North Korean prison, the first North Korean prison, the fourth North Korean prison, and the fourth North Korean prison, and Defendant A said that “I would like to renounce Korean nationality and go to North Korea.” They said, Defendant B said that “I would soon have pit, and would be Mad Mad Ma....” Defendant B said that “I would soon have spath,” and Defendant A would take the face of the victim B (50 years of age) at the time of 5 to 6 times in both directions, and Defendant A would inflict three injury, such as escape of the victim B (50 years of age). Defendant B would take the face of the victim A (50 years of age) from 78 to 78 times in both directions, and caused injury to the victim A (50 years of age) at the end of six weeks of week observation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Evidence photographs, dental technicians referred to in B, dental license plates, and medical certificates referred to in A);

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants who choose punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendants inflicted bodily injury on each other in prison, and thus, the nature of the crime is not weak in light of the body and degree of injury.

However, the Defendants recognized their mistakes and reflects, and the Defendants did not want punishment against the other party by making use of each other, and taking into account the following circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, the developments and motive leading up to the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments shall be determined as ordered.