If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

[Criminal Power] On May 29, 2019, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Incheon District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

피고인은 2020. 2. 16. 02:06경 인천 남동구 B, C 앞 노상에서 술을 마신 상태로 D 오피러스 승용차를 운전하던 중 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 인천남동경찰서 소속 경찰공무원으로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴에 홍조를 띠는 등 피고인이 술에 취한 상태에서 운전을 하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았음에도 피고인은 정당한 사유 없이 음주측정을 회피하고 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉을 하면서 입김을 제대로 불어넣지 않는 방법으로 경찰공무원의 측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Thus, although the defendant had a record of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, he did not comply with a police officer's demand for alcohol measurement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. A ledger using internal investigation reports, video CDs at the time of crackdown, 112 reported case processing records, and a breath measuring instrument;

1. Records before judgment: Application of inquiry reports and investigation reports (attached to the same type of power, etc. and summary order) including criminal records, etc.;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal Crimes, Articles 148-2 (1), 44 (1) and (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of a fine (including the details and circumstances of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime, and the fact that the defendant has no criminal record exceeding the fine, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The police officer controlling the gist of the assertion requests the defendant to take a so-called alcohol test of this case.