2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s entire confessions of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant has reached an agreement with some victims; (c) the Defendant has been punished several times for the same crime; (d) the Defendant repeatedly committed the instant crime of the same kind during the period of repeated crime for which the execution of the sentence specified in the first head of the first crime as indicated in the judgment below was completed; and (e) there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that may be considered newly after the sentence of the lower judgment; and (e) there is no change in newly considering the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime; (b) the motive or circumstance of the crime; (c) means and consequence of the crime; and (d) the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee by the Sentencing Committee, the Defendant’s assertion is unreasonable because

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.