A. The Plaintiff’s copyright business is a copyright holder of “C” and “D” (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant program”), a road design computer program, as a business of developing the computer program, which is a business of developing the computer program.

B. Defendant’s employee’s unauthorized use of the instant program 1) was a person who was engaged in the business of civil engineering, general surveying, preparation of design drawings, etc. under the name of “E”, and F is a person who was engaged in work as Defendant’s employee from January 2016 to October 31, 2016 and who was in charge of the preparation of design drawings, etc. according to Defendant’s instructions. 2) F reproduced and stored the instant program without the Plaintiff’s permission, a copyright holder, around January 2013, and installed “C” and “D,” each of the instant programs on the Defendant’s employee computer located in the Defendant’s office without permission, around January 2016.

3. By August, 300, it was used in the above service.

C. On December 15, 2017, the Defendant was convicted of a fine of KRW 3 million as the Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2017No460, Jun. 11, 2018, and the appellate court reversed the judgment of the first instance court on July 11, 2018, and determined the changes permitted by the first instance court on the following grounds: “The changes are not recognized as identical to the facts charged; thus, the previous facts charged prior to the changes are presumed to have been the Defendant’s agent status around May 2013, 201. However, on the premise that the time when the Defendant employed the Defendant as the employee was recognized as having been submitted by the prosecutor around January 2016.