On December 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on the 15:15th day of December, 2017, and proceeded with the road of 314 km away from the west Coastal Highway at the right side at the right side of the road at the right side of the transmission.

Since the place is an expressway, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely operating the driver on the road and the right and the right of the driver on the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stopped due to other traffic accidents on the front side of the victim E ( South, 30 years old) who was driven by the victim E (the rear part of the FMW car driven by this 30 years old) was the front part of the FMW car, and due to its shock, the Defendant got the victim G (the South, 45 years old) who was in front of it while pushing the above BMW car, and got the rear part of the HHHN car driven by this 45 years old.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the whole species of the light that require approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the light car, and suffered injury to the victim I ( South Korea, 30 years of age) who was on the said BMW car, such as knee and knee in need of treatment for about two weeks, and tensions and tensions, etc., on the part of the victim G, in need of approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the light, and on the part of the victim J (W, 43 years of age) who was on the said NM car, for approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the light knee and tensions.

2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution;

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (the main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents);

B. The victims’ non-existence of punishment after the prosecution of the instant case

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)