손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. Basic facts
A. On April 18, 2014, the Plaintiff had an interview with the general programming channel E press in relation to the structure of D accidents. The interview was broadcasted on April 18, 2014, and the article on the Plaintiff was reported by several media organizations.
B. On April 18, 2014, when the writing on the Plaintiff was posted with the title “F” on the “lulub Web - Miscellaneous bulletin board,” Defendant B prepared and posted the comments “Ne” as the conversation “G” on April 18, 2014.
C. On April 21, 2014, a notice was posted on the “Mari Web - Information Bulletin,” the Defendant B written and posted the comments “I” under the name of “I” on April 21, 2014, which read “I” and “I will go to the front line, and will not go to the front line.”
On October 2014, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with “defluence”, and the prosecutor of the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office (Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office) issued a disposition of suspending indictment against the Defendants on April 27, 2015.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 2 to 6, purport of whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. According to the facts of recognition as to the Plaintiff’s claim, the Defendants committed an unlawful act of insulting the Plaintiff by posting an abstract judgment that may undermine the Plaintiff’s social reputation on the Internet website bulletin board where many and unspecified persons have access, or by posting an comments or comments containing an anti-destructive sentiment against the Plaintiff, and thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are obligated to compensate for mental suffering suffered by the Plaintiff.
B. Defendant B’s assertion 1) asserts that three years have elapsed since the date of posting the comments on the instant case, and that the statute of limitations has expired. (ii) If Defendant B’s claim for damages by tort is not exercised for three years from the date of knowing the damage and the perpetrator pursuant to Article 766(1) of the Civil Act, the statute of limitations expires.