However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, as a representative C, is a personal business owner who runs a construction business with one full-time employee, including entering into a new construction contract with the owner D and performing construction works with the total floor area of 47.5 square meters from Jun. 14, 2017 to Mar. 31, 2018.

A business owner shall take measures necessary for the prevention of hazards in places where workers might fall down at work, where soil and sand, structures, etc. might collapse, where material objects might fall or come by flying off, and where other hazards may occur due to natural disasters in the course of work, and the business owner shall also take the same measures to workers employed by the contractor who have contracted for all or part of the same place as well as his/her employees.

On August 2, 2017, the Defendant awarded a contract for 2 hanok and construction works at the above construction site to F and engineer F, and the aforementioned F and F and F and F, such as F and F and F, and auxiliary victim G, and the Defendants were working on the roof after moving the studs and B, which were put on the string on the roof of the hanok, the height of which is 4 meters around August 8, 2017, to the roof.

In such cases, in the case of a work conducted in a place with a risk of falling at least 2 meters high, the contractor has a duty of care to pay safety caps and safety belts to his/her employees and workers employed by the contractor, and to install facilities, etc. to use safety belts safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the duty of care for reasons of inconvenience to work, and did not install equipment, such as a rain gauge, which is capable of walking a safety belt without paying a safety cap and a safety belt, and left the scene despite being aware that such safety measure is being carried out without being supported.