The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, it is reasonable for the court below to maintain the court of first instance that acquitted of the facts charged in the instant case on the ground that there is no proof of the crime.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of finding facts against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal principles on subjective elements of a contribution act under the Public Official Election Act.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the remaining guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but there is no indication of the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal nor any statement of grounds for appeal in the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.