2. There is no change in circumstances in the trial concerning the sentencing of the judgment, and the lower court has already determined the punishment by fully taking account of all circumstances that the Defendant already asserted as the grounds for appeal.

In particular, considering the sentencing grounds cited by the lower court, including the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime within the period of repeated crimes, such as the criminal records in hand, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and the background of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too large and does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion on sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.