2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. Japan’s invasion on the Korean Peninsula and the Pacific War, etc. (1) concluded a Japan-Japan-Japan-Japan-Japan-Japan-Japan-Japan-Japan merger Treaty on August 22, 1910, and subsequently maintained the Korean Peninsula through the Japanese-Japan-Japan-Japan-Japan General. (2) Japan was gradually entering the wartime-Pacific War in 1931 and the Japanese War in 1937, which led to the Pacific War on December 7, 1941.

3) Japan enacted the National Disciplinary Ordinance (Ordinance No. 451) under the National Mobilization Act of July 8, 1939 (No. 55 of April 1, 1938) on which the lack of human resources and goods due to a series of wars as described in the preceding paragraph was caused. From October 1, 1943 under Rule 600 of the 1943. Accordingly, Japan, while actively promoting policies to move to Japan residents with special functions, such as a manufacturer of parts for flight and steel scrap, and a ship repair hole, it was determined that Japan’s implementation of the 19th Pacific War against Japan’s initial implementation of the 8th Pacific War, which became the highest Article 54 of the Pacific War, without regard to its initial implementation. However, Japan’s implementation of the 198th Pacific Ordinance, including its initial implementation of the 198th Pacific Ordinance, without regard to its initial implementation.

B. 48 countries of the Union including the United States and the United Kingdom in the United States and Japan on September 8, 1951 after the completion of the Pacific War before and after the Pacific War.