특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal: (b) the confession and reflect of the Defendant; (c) the victim D and H were not subject to the Defendant’s punishment; and (d) the Defendant was in the appellate trial by agreement with the victim G and the victim G was not subject to the Defendant’s punishment; and (d) the Defendant was arrested with the investigative agency through L to which he is the seat of the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant was arrested with the investigative agency, the
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime was committed four times from March 18, 2014 to April 3, 2014 by the Defendant, which was habitually stolen property worth KRW 2,002,50,000, which was totaled from March 2014 to April 3, 2014, and the case was not less and less complicated in light of the motive of the instant crime, such as intrusion beyond the fence, etc. In addition, there was a history of punishment (six times of imprisonment, six times of suspended sentence of imprisonment, one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment) by the Defendant for the same kind of crime in the past, and in particular, since the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thie) in the Changwon District Court, Busan District Court, on April 18, 2012, and the execution of the repeated crime was terminated on June 21, 2012, the circumstances and circumstances of the Defendant’s criminal act and its reason.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
However, among the judgment below, it is clear that the "2013..." in the 10th sentence of the crime is a clerical error in the "2014.." and the application of statutes
1. "The Punishment of Violences, etc. Act" in the corresponding provision of the relevant Act on criminal facts is defined.