2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

가. 원고는 2009. 9. 23. 회생개시결정 전 주식회사 케이티이엔에스(변경 전 상호 : 주식회사 케이티네트웍스, 이하 ‘케이티이엔에스‘라고만 한다)에게 청주시 흥덕구 분평동 1249 분평현대대우아파트의 공동현관출입통제시스템 구축공사(이하 ‘이 사건 공사’라 한다)를 공사금액 530,000,000원에 도급(원고와 케이티이엔에스 사이에 체결된 위 공사계약을 이하 ‘이 사건 계약’이라 한다)주면서, 계약금 159,000,000원은 계약 체결 후 7일 이내에, 기성금 212,000,000원은 자동문 설치 준공 후에, 준공금 159,000,000원은 준공 후 60일 안정화 경과 후에 각 지급하기로 하였다.

B. The Plaintiff paid 368,00,000 won totaling the down payment of KRW 159,000,000 and the progress payment of KRW 209,00,000 on February 26, 2010.

C. On March 3, 2010, the Plaintiff sent to the KNS a letter requesting the suspension of the instant construction due to the internal circumstances of the apartment. The said letter reached the KNS around that time.

On March 12, 2014, KNE filed an application for commencing corporate rehabilitation with the Seoul Central District Court 2014hap55 on March 12, 2014. On the 21st of the same month, the court appointed the Defendant as the custodian of the rehabilitation company upon rendering a ruling of commencing rehabilitation. The Plaintiff filed an application for commencing corporate rehabilitation on August 1, 2014, which is within one month from August 22, 2014, the special inspection date of rehabilitation claims.

E. Under the above rehabilitation procedure on May 19, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a report on the claim for return of unjust enrichment equivalent to KRW 368,00,000, which was sought in the instant case, and the Defendant denied the total amount of the above claim, and the Plaintiff changed the purport of the instant claim to seek confirmation as rehabilitation claim equivalent to the denied amount.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 8, 10, Eul evidence 2-1 to 6, Eul evidence 3-1 to 7.