손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money that orders additional payment is revoked.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or addition of some of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following 2.3. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article
2. Five pages of the decision of the first instance on amended and added parts; and
3.(a)
2) Paragraph (2) is as follows: “2) Maximum working age and income: The Plaintiff applying daily wage to an ordinary worker until he reaches 60 years of age; and the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff had earned income while running his own business from March 17, 2010 to December 201, the Plaintiff’s income should be calculated as KRW 2,624,688 per month, which is the income earned while running the above self-employed business, or the statistical data survey report on the basic statistical survey report on the wage structure of the Statistics Korea by the Statistics Korea, should have the statistical income corresponding to the “functional source and related function worker” or “equipment operation and assembly worker” (including the serial number, hereinafter the same shall apply).
In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff’s acquisition of the qualification as pipeline technician on July 21, 1997, the Plaintiff’s registration of an individual entrepreneur for the business of manufacturing automation systems and automation systems under the trade name “L” on March 17, 2010, and around that time, the Plaintiff reported the amount of income in 2010 to Daejeon Tax Office as KRW 4,087,083, and the amount of income in 201 to KRW 51,031,81,81 to KRW 51,01,000 to Daejeon Tax Office. However, each of the above recognized facts and the entries described in Articles 10 through 15, 18 through 20, and 21 were sufficient to obtain KRW 2,624,688 as earned income at the time of the instant accident.
It is insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff had obtained income equivalent to statistical income corresponding to “the function staff and employees engaged in the related function” or “the devices, machine operation and assembly workers” in the statistical survey report of the basic statistical survey report by the Statistics Korea, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.
Therefore, the Ministry of Urban and Maritime Affairs.