손해배상(기)
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. From around March 2014 to March 2015, Defendant B, C, and D, who worked for the National Police Agency for narcotics investigation from around 2014 to around March 2015, fabricated evidence unfavorable to the Plaintiff and omitted evidence in investigation records favorable to the Plaintiff. Defendant E served a reply to the Plaintiff’s request for information disclosure as a person in charge of the F Police Agency Criminal and its affiliated request for information disclosure, stating false information.
The Defendants were jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages due to the tort committed by the Defendants, since the Plaintiff lost his/her defense right and was detained by a trial.
2. On the basis of the judgment, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendants committed an illegal act as alleged above, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. Rather, according to each of the evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including each number), it is recognized that the Plaintiff was not subject to a disposition of non-prosecution as to the above-mentioned charges against the Defendants on charges of preparing false official document, uttering of false official document, violation of the Protection of Communications Secrets Act, abuse of authority and obstruction of exercise of rights, concealment of evidence, and destruction of evidence.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.