beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.01.14 2014고단1317

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, using the name of “C”, went in and out of the off, carried out as if he were the husband of the Defendant, who was the president of the hotel casino in Busan, and was engaged in the building leasing business.

However, in fact, the husband of the defendant is the husband of the D hotel casino, and the defendant does not live in the above penta, does not engage in building rental business, and there was no property or fixed income in the name of the defendant.

1. From July 2013, the Defendant committed a crime against Victim F with the victim F, as if the Defendant was a person having the same background as the statement in the facts, and was in alliance with the victim F. On October 15, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, around 13:00 on October 15, 2013, at the Defendant’s home located in Busan Shipping Daegu G 101 Dong 2502, the Defendant’s phone calls from the victim, and that, “it is necessary to pay the victim an agreed amount at the time of the Defendant’s talking with the victim when he/she gets a person who frights to drink fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of fright of money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not need money under the pretext of the agreement of Hoin, but required money to repay the Defendant’s obligation, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim due to the lack of certain income or assets, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 20,000,000 won from the victim under the pretext of borrowing from the Busan Bank account in the name of the husband of the Defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Crimes against the Council of Victims;

A. From around September 2013, the Defendant was committed as if the Defendant had the same background as the Defendant written in the facts, and then came to know the date of the mid-term on October 2013.