Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Defendant

A is a person who sets up the C market No. 17, and the victim D(33, South Korea) is a person who sets up the C market 6th day, and the defendant and the victim are those who work and become aware of in the C market.

On August 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 06:00 on August 22, 2017, the Defendant: (b) in the Busan City Market Auction Place, brought to death the 6 gamblings of 150,000 won at the victim D’s auction price; (c) even if he was not the goods he was the goods he was the goods of which he was the goods of which he was the goods, thereby

Summary of Evidence

1. D Legal statements;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel in the investigation records (the attachment of the previous case records) and the defendant's defense counsel were aware of and brought about as the goods which he/she has been adjudicated as a successful bidder,

However, there was no negligence in view of the evidence presented in the above summary of the evidence and the records of the defendant's like the defendant.

Since it is sufficiently recognized, the above argument is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The main sentence of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears the costs of lawsuit;