No one shall put "any false indication that is likely to cause mistake, mistake, or confusion with consumers," in the name, manufacturing method, ingredients, dietitians, raw materials, use and quality of livestock products, packaging of livestock products, and tracking and managing traceability of processed livestock products."

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2016. 1. 1.부터 2017. 3. 28. 까지 위 ‘C ’에서, 위 ‘C’ 가 국내외 할 랄 (Halal) 인증ㆍ보증기관에서 인증ㆍ보증을 받은 사실이 없음에도 위 ‘C’ 가 할 랄 인증을 받은 것처럼 랄랄 인증보증 표시와 유사한 ‘ 표시( 로고)’ 가 인쇄된 포장지를 이용, 수입한 소고기, 양고기 등을 절단ㆍ포장함으로써, ‘ 사실과 다르거나 소비자를 기만하거나 오인 ㆍ 혼동시킬 우려가 있는 할 랄 (Halal) 허위 표시 ’를 하고 냉동 우육 등 포장 육 11,427개 45,650,000원 상당을 판매하였다.

2. In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts and circumstances can be acknowledged.

① The Defendant indicated the marks bearing the HALAL in English (hereinafter referred to as the “instant marks”) in the English language and the lower part of the outer part of the packaging part of the instant product.

② HALAL (UAL) is permitted, and it is a general term term term that allows Muslim to use for drinking by Islamic tariff rates.

3. Among the marks that are to be raised certification, there are indications of HALAL, etc. in the nesn part, and the institutions or organizations certifying the products to be raised have other indications or symbols indicating themselves on the certification mark.

④ Accordingly, the part indicated in the HAL and the part indicated in the nests cannot be considered as a distinctive part in comparison with the marks. Thus, the Defendant indicated the instant case.