beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.12 2019고합349

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 7, 2017, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced 1 year and six months of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (Larceny) to the criminal facts that habitually stolen property, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on June 7, 2018.

On February 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) laid the air conditioner pipe pipes connected to the wall of the building, cut off two air conditioner pipes connected to the wall of the building after cutting off the air conditioner pipes connected to the air conditioner, dismantled the air conditioner, and cut up the air conditioner installed in the building, and cut off them together with the above cut pipes at the above location four times in total during the period from February 2019 to March 2019, the Defendant brought about four air conditioner pipes owned by the victim D Co., Ltd. in total at the market price of eight air conditioner and the market price of 120,000,000 won.

On March 8, 2019, at around 06:35, the Defendant: (a) opened a door in which the victim F is not locked by the victim’s surveillance in the public announcement source operated by Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “G” and entered the rooftop; (b) removed air conditioners from the victim’s market price in which the victim’s control was neglected; and (c) removed air conditioners from the victim’s market price in which the victim’s control was prepared.

around 06:30 on March 13, 2019, the Defendant entered the commercial building in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H by making use of the gaps in surveillance negligence, and cut off the amount equivalent to KRW 60,000,000 at the market price of 5 meters air-conditioning pipe pipes owned by the victim I, and did not come up with the wind that is discovered by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim D Co., Ltd. and F's property, and attempted to steals the victim I's property.

(i) the evidence;