폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
2014 Highest 3973 Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault)
1. A (66 years, remaining) and the head of an organization of a construction and plant trade union;
2. B (75 years, remaining) and the head of the organization of a construction and plant trade union;
Park Jong-ho ( Indictment) and Kim Jong-ho (Trial)
Attorney Kim Jong-soo (Korean Charter for the Defendants)
April 30, 2015
Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,00, and KRW 700, and KRW 00 by a fine of KRW 700, and KRW 00.
In the event that the defendants fail to pay the above fine, the period of 100,000 won converted into one day shall be avoided.
The custody of senior citizens in a workhouse.
In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.
Criminal History Office
Defendant A and Defendant B are the head of the Ulsan District Department for the Ulsan District of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the "Ulsan Plant Department").
On October 16, 2014, the Defendants confirmed the company belonging to workers who work in the company, and whether they join the labor union in front of the company of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, Ulsan-gu, and the employees who work in front of the company of Ulsan-gu. The Defendants requested workers not to work in the workplace, with ten members of the labor union in the name of Ulsan-gu.
Defendant B and the members of the Ulsan Plant Labor Co., Ltd., who work at the above date and at the above location, obstructed the front of the victim D (the age of 39) who is working at the above time and at the above location, and the victim "I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am you am I am you am you am I am I
As a result, the Defendants assaulted the victim jointly with the members of the Ulsan Plant Labor Group.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol on Defendant B (including D substitute part)
1. D. J. J. * Each police protocol of statement about D. *
Application of Statutes
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;
Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines)
1. Detention in a workhouse;
Article 70 (1) of the Criminal Code
1. Order of provisional payment;
Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
Reasons for sentencing
Although there was no agreement with the victim, the degree of assault and damage is minor, and all the defendants are punished by fines, taking into account the fact that there is no specific criminal power in addition to those punished twice by fines, and that there is a reflective fact, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined.
Judges Doese