2. The judgment of the court below seems to have recognized all of the crimes of this case, the mother of the defendant agreed with some victims, the age of the defendant is relatively old, and there are no specific criminal records other than fines. However, the crime of this case is committed on about 180 occasions from December 7, 2012 to March 30, 2014 by deceiving the defendant that he sold valuable goods to many unspecified victims over about 180 times, and, in light of the criminal law, the period of the crime, and the number of victims, etc., the crime is not very good. The damage amount of the crime of this case exceeds 50 million won but is not recovered from damage to most victims, and there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances favorable to the defendant after the sentence of the court below, and there is no reason to acknowledge the punishment of this case as being unfair since the defendant's environment, character and behavior, the circumstances and the result of the crime of this case are not recognized.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.