However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing taxi.

On August 10, 2016, the Defendant, around 23:20 on August 10, 2016, proceeded with the three-lane of apartment road, which is located in Spo-dong Kimpo-dong, in Spo-dong, from Spo-dong-si to Seoul Do-ro, with three-lane of the three-lane road.

At the same time, signal lights are installed, and the speed limit is set at 50km per hour, so a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is negligent in complying with signal signals and in performing duties that should safely proceed with the speed limit, and due to negligence that enters the intersection at the speed of 71km speed above 21km per hour, when the speed limit is exceeded 21km, the side of the victim C(54 years old) driver to turn to the left in the direction of the signal pursuant to the signal is shocked by the front driver of the victim E (49 years old) who is the passenger of the said string taxi, and the victim E (70 years old) who is the passenger of the said string-off car suffers from approximately 6 weeks injury such as light fat, etc. which needs to be treated for about 2 weeks, and the victim F(F) who is the passenger of the cab is closed for about 44 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents and each diagnosis report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on a photograph of each photograph and a screen image closure;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the part of the victims of this case is disadvantageous, but it is unfavorable that the defendant reflects his mistake, that the defendant was dealt with insurance by the taxi mutual aid association to which the defendant joined, and that the defendant did not want the victim's punishment, and that the defendant was punished by a fine for driving under the influence of alcohol in 201.